1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
AI Summary
AI-generated summary of this article
AI-generated content is provided as a reading aid. Please refer to the original article for authoritative information. View the full-text PDF
AI Q&A
AI-generated questions and answers
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify answers against the original article.
Open Access Review

Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making

by Yuxin Shang 1 Xinting Huang 2  and  Ke Song 1,*
1
West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
2
Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AI Med  2025 1(3):15; https://doi.org/10.71423/aimed.20251206
Received: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 1 December 2025 / Published Online: 6 December 2025
Abstract

Recent increases in overweight and obesity have established Metabolic–Bariatric Surgery (MBS) as a principal intervention for durable weight reduction and metabolic improvement. Given the elevated perioperative complication risk among patients with obesity, there is a growing imperative to enhance the precision of preoperative management. This review synthesizes evidence from 2020–2025 on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to bariatric surgery preoperative assessment, focusing on machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and large language models (LLMs). We summarize AI applications across three domains: preoperative risk prediction and individual assessment, patient stratification and procedure selection, and preoperative education and surgical training. The evidence suggests that integrating AI into routine preoperative workflows enables individualized, quantitative estimation of high-risk complications and weight-loss prognosis, thereby optimizing risk management; it can also support patient stratification and procedure matching to facilitate patient-centered shared decision-making; and NLP- and vision-based tools promote standardization and visualization of knowledge for patients and surgeons. Overall, AI is driving preoperative assessment toward greater individualization, interpretability, and multidisciplinary coordination, but its clinical generalizability requires validation in multicenter, prospective studies.


Copyright: © 2025 by Shang, Huang and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Shang, Y., Huang, X., & Song, K. (2025). Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med, 1(3), 15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
ACS Style
Shang, Y.; Huang, X.; Song, K. Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med, 2025, 1, 15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
AMA Style
Shang Y., Huang X., Song K.. Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med; 2025, 1(3):15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
Chicago/Turabian Style
Shang, Yuxin; Huang, Xinting; Song, Ke 2025. "Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making" AI Med 1, no.3:15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
Share and Cite
APA Style
Shang, Y., Huang, X., & Song, K. (2025). Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med, 1(3), 15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
ACS Style
Shang, Y.; Huang, X.; Song, K. Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med, 2025, 1, 15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
AMA Style
Shang Y., Huang X., Song K.. Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making. AI Med; 2025, 1(3):15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
Chicago/Turabian Style
Shang, Yuxin; Huang, Xinting; Song, Ke 2025. "Machine Learning and Large Language Models in Preoperative Bariatric Surgery: From Risk Assessment to Shared Decision-Making" AI Med 1, no.3:15. doi:10.71423/aimed.20251206
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
  1. GBD 2021 Adult BMI Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence of adult overweight and obesity, 1990–2021, with forecasts to 2050: a forecasting study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 2025, 405, 813–838.
  2. Campbell, L. A.; Kombathula, R.; Jackson, C. D. Obesity in Adults. JAMA 2024, 332, 600.
  3. Barrett, T. S.; Hafermann, J. O.; Richards, S.; LeJeune, K.; Eid, G. M. Obesity Treatment With Bariatric Surgery vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. JAMA Surg 2025, 160, 1232–1239.
  4. Courcoulas, A. P.; Patti, M. E.; Hu, B.; Arterburn, D. E.; Simonson, D. C.; Gourash, W. F.; Jakicic, J. M.; Vernon, A. H.; Beck, G. J.; Schauer, P. R.; et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Medical Management vs Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA 2024, 331, 654–664.
  5. Sjöholm, K.; Carlsson, L. M. S.; Svensson, P. A.; Andersson-Assarsson, J. C.; Kristensson, F.; Jacobson, P.; Peltonen, M.; Taube, M. Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Incidence in Patients With Obesity and Diabetes: Long-term Results From the Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Diabetes Care 2022, 45, 444–450.
  6. Syn, N. L.; Cummings, D. E.; Wang, L. Z.; Lin, D. J.; Zhao, J. J.; Loh, M.; Koh, Z. J.; Chew, C. A.; Loo, Y. E.; Tai, B. C.; et al. Association of metabolic-bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants. Lancet 2021, 397, 1830–1841.
  7. Katasani, T.; Holt, G.; Al-Khyatt, W.; Idris, I. Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patients after Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2023, 33, 2016–2024.
  8. Apfelbaum, J. L.; Hagberg, C. A.; Connis, R. T.; Abdelmalak, B. B.; Agarkar, M.; Dutton, R. P.; Fiadjoe, J. E.; Greif, R.; Klock, P. A.; Mercier, D.; et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022, 136, 31–81.
  9. Freire-Moreira, I.; Sanchez-Conde, M. P.; Sousa, G. B.; Garrido-Gallego, M. I.; Rodríguez-López, J. M.; Juárez-Vela, R.; Bragado, J. A.; Carretero-Hernández, M.; Vargas-Chiarella, C. R.; Calderón-Moreno, J.; et al. Systematic preoperative approach for bariatric surgery, perioperative results, and economic impact. Front Public Health 2024, 12, 1439948.
  10. Hwang, M.; Nagappa, M.; Guluzade, N.; Saripella, A.; Englesakis, M.; Chung, F. Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a preoperative screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2022, 22, 366.
  11. DeMaria, E. J.; Portenier, D.; Wolfe, L. Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007, 3, 134–140.
  12. Coblijn, U. K.; Lagarde, S. M.; de Raaff, C. A. L.; de Castro, S. M.; van Tets, W. F.; Bonjer, H. J.; van Wagensveld, B. A. Evaluation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score for the prediction of postoperative complications after primary and revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2016, 12, 1504–1512.
  13. Matarredona, Quiles, S.; Carrasco, Llatas M.; Martínez Ruíz de Apodaca, P.; Díez Ares, J. Á.; Navarro Martínez, S.; Dalmau Galofre, J. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in obese patients candidates for bariatric surgery and predictive questionnaires. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2024, 75, 354–360.
  14. Bonde, A.; Varadarajan, K. M.; Bonde, N.; Troelsen, A.; Muratoglu, O. K.; Malchau, H.; Yang, A. D.; Alam, H.; Sillesen, M. Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study. Lancet Digit Health 2021, 3, e471–e485.
  15. Saux, P.; Bauvin, P.; Raverdy, V.; Teigny, J.; Verkindt, H.; Soumphonphakdy, T.; Debert, M.; Jacobs, A.; Jacobs, D.; Monpellier, V.; et al. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based calculator for predicting 5-year weight trajectories after bariatric surgery: a multinational retrospective cohort SOPHIA study. Lancet Digit Health 2023, 5, e692–e702.
  16. LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436–444.
  17. Xu, J.; Liu, D.; Du, Q.; Wan, Q.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, G.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, Y. AI-enabled prevention and management of nutritional complications in metabolic-bariatric surgery: technological innovation and clinical practice. Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025, 34, 632–639.
  18. Carron, M.; Safaee Fakhr, B.; Ieppariello, G.; Foletto, M. Perioperative care of the obese patient. Br J Surg 2020, 107, e39–e55.
  19. Liew, W. J.; Negar, A.; Singh, P. A. Airway management in patients suffering from morbid obesity. Saudi J Anaesth 2022, 16, 314–321.
  20. Collins, J. S.; Lemmens, H. J. M.; Brodsky, J. B. Obesity and difficult intubation: where is the evidence? Anesthesiology 2006, 104, 617, author reply 618–619.
  21. Moon, T. S.; Fox, P. E.; Somasundaram, A.; Minhajuddin, A.; Gonzales, M. X.; Pak, T. J.; Ogunnaike, B. The influence of morbid obesity on difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation. J Anesth 2019, 33, 96–102.
  22. Stenberg, E.; Dos Reis Falcão, L. F.; O'Kane, M.; Liem, R.; Pournaras, D. J.; Salminen, P.; Urman, R. D.; Wadhwa, A.; Gustafsson, U. O.; Thorell, A. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update. World J Surg 2022, 46, 729–751.
  23. Zhou, C. M.; Xue, Q.; Ye, H. T.; Wang, Y.; Tong, J.; Ji, M. H.; Yang, J. J. Constructing a prediction model for difficult intubation of obese patients based on machine learning. J Clin Anesth 2021, 72, 110278.
  24. Zhou, C. M.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Q.; Yang, J. J.; Zhu, Y. Predicting difficult airway intubation in thyroid surgery using multiple machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Front Public Health 2022, 10, 937471.
  25. Hayasaka, T.; Kawano, K.; Kurihara, K.; Suzuki, H.; Nakane, M.; Kawamae, K. Creation of an artificial intelligence model for intubation difficulty classification by deep learning (convolutional neural network) using face images: an observational study. J Intensive Care 2021, 9, 38.
  26. Sezari, P.; Kohzadi, Z.; Dabbagh, A.; Jafari, A.; Khoshtinatan, S.; Mottaghi, K.; Kohzadi, Z.; Rahmatizadeh, S. Unravelling intubation challenges: a machine learning approach incorporating multiple predictive parameters. BMC Anesthesiol 2024, 24, 453.
  27. Nijland, L. M. G.; van Veldhuisen, S. L.; van Veen, R. N.; Hazebroek, E. J.; Bonjer, H. J.; de Castro, S. M. M. Complications and predictors associated with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea in bariatric surgery: Evaluation of routine obstructive sleep apnoea screening. Surgeon 2023, 21, e361–e366.
  28. Mechanick, J. I.; Apovian, C.; Brethauer, S.; Timothy Garvey, W.; Joffe, A. M.; Kim, J.; Kushner, R. F.; Lindquist, R.; Pessah-Pollack, R.; Seger, J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020, 28, O1–O58.
  29. Stenberg, E.; Dos Reis Falcão, L. F.; O'Kane, M.; Liem, R.; Pournaras, D. J.; Salminen, P.; Urman, R. D.; Wadhwa, A.; Gustafsson, U. O.; Thorell, A. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update. World J Surg 2022, 46, 729–751.
  30. Choi, M.-S.; Han, D.-H.; Choi, J.-W.; Kang, M.-S. A Study on Improving Sleep Apnea Diagnoses Using Machine Learning Based on the STOP-BANG Questionnaire. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3117.
  31. Levy, J.; Álvarez, D.; Del Campo, F.; Behar, J. A. Deep learning for obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis based on single channel oximetry. Nat Commun 2023, 14, 4881.
  32. Campos, G. M.; Mazzini, G. S.; Altieri, M. S.; Docimo, S. Jr; DeMaria, E. J.; Rogers, A. M. Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021, 17, 837–847.
  33. Di Lorenzo, N.; Antoniou, S. A.; Batterham, R. L.; Busetto, L.; Godoroja, D.; Iossa, A.; Carrano, F. M.; Agresta, F.; Alarçon, I.; Azran, C.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP. Surg Endosc 2020, 34, 2332–2358.
  34. Tian, P.; Fu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P. Unveiling the hidden pathologies: preoperative endoscopic findings in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. BMC Surg 2024, 24, 215.
  35. Bennett, S.; Gostimir, M.; Shorr, R.; Mallick, R.; Mamazza, J.; Neville, A. The role of routine preoperative upper endoscopy in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016, 12, 1116–1125.
  36. Chadebecq, F.; Lovat, L. B.; Stoyanov, D. Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023, 20, 171–182.
  37. Hany, M.; Shafei, M. E.; Ibrahim, M.; Agayby, A. S. S.; Abouelnasr, A. A.; Aboelsoud, M. R.; Elmongui, E.; Torensma, B. The Role of Preoperative Abdominal Ultrasound in the Preparation of Patients Undergoing Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Machine Learning Algorithm on 4418 Patients' Records. Obes Surg 2024, 34, 3445–3458.
  38. Assaf, D.; Rayman, S.; Segev, L.; Neuman, Y.; Zippel, D.; Goitein, D. Improving pre-bariatric surgery diagnosis of hiatal hernia using machine learning models. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2022, 31, 760–767.
  39. Nudel, J.; Bishara, A. M.; de Geus, S. W. L.; Patil, P.; Srinivasan, J.; Hess, D. T.; Woodson, J. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict gastrointestinal leak and venous thromboembolism after weight loss surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc 2021, 35, 182–191.
  40. Romero-Velez, G.; Dang, J.; Barajas-Gamboa, J. S.; Lee-St John, T.; Strong, A. T.; Navarrete, S.; Corcelles, R.; Rodriguez, J.; Fares, M.; Kroh, M. Machine learning prediction of major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2024, 38, 319–326.
  41. Park, J.; Park, S.; Lee, K.-S.; Kwon, Y. Predictive and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Insights from Wide and Deep Learning with Medical Image and Non-Image Data. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2457.
  42. Nadal, E.; Benito, E.; Ródenas-Navarro, A. M.; Palanca, A.; Martinez-Hervas, S.; Civera, M.; Ortega, J.; Alabadi, B.; Piqueras, L.; Ródenas, J. J.; Real, J. T. Machine Learning Model in Obesity to Predict Weight Loss One Year after Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1175.
  43. Saux, P.; Bauvin, P.; Raverdy, V.; Teigny, J.; Verkindt, H.; Soumphonphakdy, T.; Debert, M.; Jacobs, A.; Jacobs, D.; Monpellier, V.; et al. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based calculator for predicting 5-year weight trajectories after bariatric surgery: a multinational retrospective cohort SOPHIA study. Lancet Digit Health 2023, 5, e692–e702.
  44. Salminen, P.; Grönroos, S.; Helmiö, M.; Hurme, S.; Juuti, A.; Juusela, R.; Peromaa-Haavisto, P.; Leivonen, M.; Nuutila, P.; Ovaska, J. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss, Comorbidities, and Reflux at 10 Years in Adult Patients With Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2022, 157, 656–666.
  45. Kraljevic, M.; Süsstrunk, J.; Wölnerhanssen, B. K.; Peters, T.; Bueter, M.; Gero, D.; Schultes, B.; Poljo, A.; Schneider, R.; Peterli, R. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2025, 160, 369–377.
  46. Akpinar, E. O.; Liem, R. S. L.; Nienhuijs, S. W.; Greve, J. W. M.; Marang-van de Mheen, P. J.; Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity Research Group. Hospital Variation in Preference for a Specific Bariatric Procedure and the Association with Weight Loss Performance: a Nationwide Analysis. Obes Surg 2022, 32, 3589–3599.
  47. Poelemeijer, Y. Q. M.; Liem, R. S. L.; Våge, V.; Mala, T.; Sundbom, M.; Ottosson, J.; Nienhuijs, S. W. Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy: Patient Selection and Short-term Outcome of 47,101 Primary Operations From the Swedish, Norwegian, and Dutch National Quality Registries. Ann Surg 2020, 272, 326–333.
  48. Jazi, A. H. D.; Mahjoubi, M.; Shahabi, S.; Alqahtani, A. R.; Haddad, A.; Pazouki, A.; Prasad, A.; Safadi, B. Y.; Chiappetta, S.; Taskin, H. E.; et al. Bariatric Evaluation Through AI: a Survey of Expert Opinions Versus ChatGPT-4 (BETA-SEOV). Obes Surg 2023, 33, 3971–3980.
  49. Lopez-Gonzalez, R.; Sanchez-Cordero, S.; Pujol-Gebellí, J.; Castellvi, J. Evaluation of the Impact of ChatGPT on the Selection of Surgical Technique in Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2025, 35, 19–24.
  50. Sanchez-Cordero, S.; Lopez-Gonzalez, R.; Fernandez, H.; Pujol-Gebellí, J. Training ChatGPT for surgical decisions: Bariatric surgery analysis using algorithms and evidence. Obes Res Clin Pract 2025, 19, 352–355.
  51. Ayo-Ajibola, O.; Davis, R. J.; Lin, M. E.; Riddell, J.; Kravitz, R. L. Characterizing the Adoption and Experiences of Users of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Health Information in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2024, 26, e55138.
  52. Guo, P.; East, L.; Arthur, A. Thinking outside the black box: the importance of context in understanding the impact of a preoperative education nursing intervention among Chinese cardiac patients. Patient Educ Couns 2014, 95, 365–70.
  53. Leng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, C. Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT-4 as a Knowledge Resource in Bariatric Surgery: A Preliminary Assessment. Obes Surg 2025, 35, 645–650.
  54. Lee, Y.; Shin, T.; Tessier, L.; Javidan, A.; Jung, J.; Hong, D.; Strong, A. T.; McKechnie, T.; Malone, S.; Jin, D.; et al., Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024, 20, 603–608.
  55. Lam, K.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Iqbal, F. M.; Darzi, A.; Lo, B.; Purkayastha, S.; Kinross, J. M. Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review. npj Digital Medicine 2022, 5, 24.
  56. Yilmaz, R.; Bakhaidar, M.; Alsayegh, A.; Abou Hamdan, N.; Fazlollahi, A. M.; Tee, T.; Langleben, I.; Winkler-Schwartz, A.; Laroche, D.; Santaguida, C.; et al. Del Maestro RF. Real-Time multifaceted artificial intelligence vs In-Person instruction in teaching surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2024, 14, 15130.
  57. Ma, R.; Kiyasseh, D.; Laca, J. A.; Kocielnik, R.; Wong, E. Y.; Chu, T. N.; Cen, S.; Yang, C. H.; Dalieh, I. S.; Haque, T. F.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Feedback to Improve Novice Performance on Robotic Suturing Skills: A Pilot Study. J Endourol 2024, 38, 884–891.
  58. Duran Espinoza, V.; Belmar Riveros, F.; Jarry Trujillo, C.; Gaete Dañobeitia, M. I.; Montero Jaras, I.; Miguieles Schilling, M.; Valencia Coronel, B.; Escalona, G.; Tirado, P. A.; Quezada, N.; et al. Five-Year Experience Training Surgeons with a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program for Bariatric Surgery: a Quasi-experimental Design. Obes Surg 2023, 33, 1831–1837.
  59. Dayan, D. Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer Vision Model for Sleeve Gastrectomy: Experience in One Tertiary Center. Obes Surg 2024, 34, 330–336.
  60. Fer, D.; Zhang, B.; Abukhalil, R.; Goel, V.; Goel, B.; Barker, J.; Kalesan, B.; Barragan, I.; Gaddis, M. L.; Kilroy, P. G. An artificial intelligence model that automatically labels roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, a comparison to trained surgeon annotators. Surg Endosc 2023, 37, 5665–5672.
  61. Sauerland, S.; Angrisani, L.; Belachew, M.; Chevallier, J. M.; Favretti, F.; Finer, N.; Fingerhut, A.; Garcia Caballero, M.; Guisado Macias, J. A.; Mittermair, R.; et al. Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2005, 19, 200–221.
  62. Mechanick, J. I.; Apovian, C.; Brethauer, S.; Garvey, W. T.; Joffe, A. M.; Kim, J.; Kushner, R. F.; Lindquist, R.; Pessah-Pollack, R.; Seger, J.; et al. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE PERIOPERATIVE NUTRITION, METABOLIC, AND NONSURGICAL SUPPORT OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC PROCEDURES - 2019 UPDATE: COSPONSORED BY AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, THE OBESITY SOCIETY, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC & BARIATRIC SURGERY, OBESITY MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, AND AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract 2019, 25, 1346–1359.
  63. Campos, G. M.; Mazzini, G. S.; Altieri, M. S.; Docimo, S. Jr; DeMaria, E. J.; Rogers, A. M. Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021, 17, 837–847.
  64. Wang, Y.; Liang, H.; Zhang, P.; Yang, J.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, C.; Zhu, S. Chinese clinical guidelines for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (2024 edition). Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery 2024, 44, 841–849.
  65. Knevel, R.; Liao, K. P. From real-world electronic health record data to real-world results using artificial intelligence. Ann Rheum Dis 2023, 82, 306–311.
  66. Sittig, D. F.; Singh, H. Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. N Engl J Med 2012, 367, 1854–1860.
  67. Sun, G. K.; Ambrosy, A. P. Applying Natural Language Processing to Electronic Health Record Data-From Text to Triage. JAMA Netw Open 2024, 7, e2443934.
  68. Ren, Y.; Loftus, T. J.; Datta, S.; Ruppert, M. M.; Guan, Z.; Miao, S.; Shickel, B.; Feng, Z.; Giordano, C.; Upchurch, G. R. Jr; et al. Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Postoperative Complications and Report on a Mobile Platform. JAMA Netw Open 2022, 5, e2211973.
  69. Iacucci, M.; Santacroce, G.; Meseguer, P.; Diéguez, A.; Del Amor, R.; Kolawole, B. B.; Chaudhari, U.; Zammarchi, I.; Hayes, B.; Crotty, R.; et al. Endo-Histo foundational fusion model: a novel artificial intelligence for assessing histologic remission and response to therapy in ulcerative colitis clinical trial. J Crohns Colitis 2025, 19, jjaf108.
  70. Boehm, K. M.; El Nahhas, O. S. M.; Marra, A.; Waters, M.; Jee, J.; Braunstein, L.; Schultz, N.; Selenica, P.; Wen, H. Y.; Weigelt, B.; et al. Multimodal histopathologic models stratify hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Nat Commun 2025, 16, 2106.
  71. Soenksen, L. R.; Ma, Y.; Zeng, C.; Boussioux, L.; Carballo, K. V.; Na, L.; Wiberg, H. M.; Li, M. L.; Fuentes, I.; Bertsimas, D. Integrated multimodal artificial intelligence framework for healthcare applications. npj Digital Medicine 2022, 5, 149.
© 2026 AI Press Limited (香港人工智能出版社有限公司) Business Registration No.: 77381708 Registered Address: Flat B01, 2/F, Kin Tak Fung Industrial Building, 174 Wai Yip Street, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong Contact: [email protected]